calctube
📚 Guide 🏠 vs 🔑 Updated2026-07-10

Rent vs buy: the real maths.

Quick answer

Buying a ₹80.0 L home instead of renting at ₹28,000/month, the buyer's net worth overtakes the renter's around year 10+. Before that, renting and investing the ₹20.8 L down-payment-plus-stamp-duty usually wins. Time in the home is the whole game.

The honest comparison

"Rent is money down the drain" and "buying is always better" are both half-truths. The fair way to compare is to assume both people spend the same amount each month: the buyer on EMI, maintenance and upfront costs; the renter on rent, with every rupee of difference invested. Then track each person's net worth over time. Below is exactly that simulation for a ₹80.0 L home (20% down, 8.5% loan over 20 years, 6% stamp duty, 6%/yr appreciation) versus a ₹28,000/month rental rising 7%/yr, with the renter's portfolio compounding at 10%.

After year Buyer net worth Renter net worth Winner
Year 1 ₹22.1 L ₹26.9 L 🔑 Rent
Year 3 ₹35.5 L ₹40.5 L 🔑 Rent
Year 5 ₹50.7 L ₹56.0 L 🔑 Rent
Year 7 ₹68.0 L ₹73.7 L 🔑 Rent
Year 10 ₹98.5 L ₹1.05 Cr 🔑 Rent

The pattern is almost always the same shape: the renter leads early (because the buyer's ₹20.8 L upfront and front-loaded interest haven't been recovered), and then the buyer pulls ahead as equity builds and appreciation compounds, crossing over around year 10 and widening after. By year 10 the buyer is at ₹98.5 L versus the renter's ₹1.05 Cr. Change the inputs (a cheaper home, a bigger rent, faster appreciation) and the crossover moves, but the shape holds.

The one number that decides it

How long you'll stay. Every other variable is secondary to the holding period, because the upfront costs of buying (stamp duty, registration, and the interest-heavy early years) only pay off with time. If there's a real chance you'll move within 3-5 years (a job change, a growing family, a city you're not sure about), the maths and the flexibility both favour renting. If you're planting roots for 7+ years, buying's forced-saving and appreciation usually win. Don't buy for the investment return; buy for the stability, and let the return be a bonus.

❓ FAQ

Common questions.

Is it better to rent or buy in 2026?
It depends on how long you'll stay. Buying wins over the long run because you build equity and the property appreciates, but the upfront costs (down payment + 6% stamp duty) take years to recover. In our base scenario (a ₹80.0 L home vs a ₹28,000/month rental), the buyer's net worth overtakes the renter's around year 10. Below that horizon, renting and investing the difference usually leaves you richer.
What is the "rent and invest the difference" argument?
The strongest case for renting: instead of sinking ₹20.8 L into a down payment and stamp duty, you invest it, and you invest the gap between the (higher) monthly cost of owning and your (lower) rent. Compounded at 10%, that portfolio can rival home equity for years. It only works if you actually invest the difference with discipline; most people spend it, which is the quiet reason buying "wins" for them.
Why does the break-even take so many years?
Two upfront costs you never recover: stamp duty and registration (6%+ of the price, gone the day you buy) and the front-loaded interest on your loan (early EMIs are mostly interest, not equity). Add brokerage and moving costs on a future sale, and the "buying transaction" needs several years of appreciation and principal repayment just to break even. That's why the rule of thumb is: don't buy unless you'll hold the home at least 5-7 years.
Does home-loan tax benefit change the maths?
It helps buying, modestly. Under the old tax regime you can deduct up to ₹2 lakh of home-loan interest (Section 24b) and principal within the ₹1.5 lakh 80C limit, worth a few thousand rupees a month in tax saved for higher earners. Under the new regime (now the default) those deductions largely vanish, so many buyers no longer get them. Factor your actual regime in; don't assume the old benefits still apply.
What makes renting clearly the right call?
Renting wins when: you might relocate within a few years (job mobility), the local price-to-rent ratio is very high (property costs 30-40x annual rent, common in overheated metros), you'd be stretching to the edge of affordability to buy, or you're disciplined enough to genuinely invest the difference. Buying wins when you'll stay long-term, prices are reasonable versus rent, and the stability and forced-saving of a mortgage matter to you.